Blog

It is important for organizations to address the agency problem in order to ensure effective management and decision-making. The agency problem is a conflict of interests between the principal and the agent, where the agent is expected to act in the best interest of the principal but may act in their own interest instead. It is a common problem in business organizations and can have serious repercussions if it is not addressed properly. In this article, we will discuss the different types of agency problem, the causes of agency problem, and the strategies that can be used to reduce agency problem.

Earn a certificate in your dream career for an affordable price at IAP Career College today!

Introduction to Agency Problem

Agency problem is the conflict of interests between the principal and the agent, where the agent may not act in the best interest of the principal. This problem is quite common in organizations and can have serious repercussions if it is not addressed properly. The principal is the party which delegates the authority to the agent to act on their behalf. The agent is the party which is delegated the authority to act on behalf of the principal. The principal is usually the owner of a business or a shareholder in the company, while the agent is usually the manager or executive of the organization.

The essence of the agency problem is that since the agent is not the owner of the business, they may not have the same incentives as the principal. This can lead to the agent acting in their own interest instead of the interest of the principal. This can have serious repercussions for the organization as it can lead to mismanagement, poor decision-making, and loss of value. Therefore, it is important for organizations to address the agency problem in order to ensure effective management and decision-making.

Different Types of Agency Problem

The agency problem can be classified into three main types. The first type is the principal-agent conflict, which is the conflict of interests between the principal and the agent. This is the most common type of agency problem and can have serious repercussions if it is not addressed properly. The second type is the principal-principal conflict, which is the conflict of interests between two principals, such as between the owners of a business. The third type is the agent-agent conflict, which is the conflict of interests between two agents, such as between two managers in a business.

Causes of Agency Problem

There are several causes of agency problem which can lead to the conflict of interests between the principal and the agent. The first cause is the lack of communication between the principal and the agent. If the principal does not communicate their expectations and goals to the agent, the agent may not act in the best interest of the principal. The second cause is the lack of trust between the principal and the agent. If the principal does not trust the agent, they may not be willing to delegate authority to the agent, which can lead to the agent not acting in the best interest of the principal.

The third cause is the lack of incentives for the agent. If the agent does not have the right incentives, they may not be motivated to act in the best interest of the principal. The fourth cause is the lack of performance evaluation and performance measurement. If the principal does not evaluate the performance of the agent, they may not be able to identify and address any conflicts of interests between the principal and the agent.

Strategies to Reduce Agency Problem

Fortunately, there are several strategies that organizations can use to reduce the Agency Problem and ensure better alignment between the principal and the agent. These strategies include performance evaluation and performance measurement, risk and reward sharing, corporate governance and internal control, communication and conflict resolution, and aligning the interests of the principal and the agent.

Performance Evaluation and Performance Measurement

Performance evaluation and performance measurement are key strategies for reducing the Agency Problem. Organizations should use performance metrics to measure the performance of the agent and ensure that they are acting in the best interests of the principal. Performance metrics should be tailored to the specific needs of the organization and should be regularly monitored to ensure that the agent is performing as expected.

Risk and Reward Sharing

Risk and reward sharing is another important strategy for reducing the Agency Problem. Organizations should ensure that the agent is adequately rewarded for their efforts and that they are taking on an appropriate level of risk. This will ensure that the agent is motivated to act in the best interests of the principal. Additionally, organizations should ensure that the rewards are commensurate with the risk taken by the agent.

Corporate Governance and Internal Control

Corporate governance and internal control are also important strategies for reducing the Agency Problem. Organizations should ensure that appropriate procedures and controls are in place to ensure that the agent is acting in the best interests of the principal. This can include measures such as regular reporting and monitoring, internal audit processes, and internal control systems. Additionally, organizations should ensure that their corporate governance processes are aligned with the interests of the principal.

Communication and Conflict Resolution

Communication and conflict resolution are also important strategies for reducing the Agency Problem. Organizations should ensure that there is effective communication between the principal and the agent and that any conflicts are resolved in a timely manner. This will ensure that the interests of the principal and the agent are aligned and that the agent is acting in the best interests of the principal.

Performance based incentive plans:

Most publicly traded firms now employ performance shares, which are shares of stock given to executives no the basis of performance as defined by financial measures such as earnings per share, return on assets, return on equity, and stock price changes.

If corporate acting is above the performance targets, the firm’s managers win more shares. If performance is under the target, however, they accept less than 100 percent of the shares. Incentive-based compensation plans, such as performance shares, are designed to satisfy two objectives.

First, they offer executives incentives to take actions that will prolong shareholder wealth. Second, these plans help companies attract and retain managers who have the confidence to risk their financial future on their own abilities- which should lead to better performance.

Direct intervention by institutional investors:

An increasing percentage of common stock in the corporate sector is owned by institutional investors such as insurance companies, pension funds, and mutual funds. The institutional money managers have the clout, if they choose, to exert considerable influence over a firm’s operation.

Institutional investors can impact a firm’s managers in two initial ways. First, they can meet with a firm’s management and offer a suggestion regarding the firm’s operations.

Second, institutional shareholders can sponsor an offer to be voted on at the annual stockholders’ meeting. Even if the proposal is opposed by management. Although such a shareholder-sponsored proposal is nonbinding and involves issues outside day-to-day operations. The results of these votes clearly influence management options.

The threat of takeover:

A hostile takeover, which occurs when management does not wish to sell the firm, is most likely to develop when a firm’s stock is undervalued relative to its potential because of inadequate management.

In a hostile takeover, the senior managers of the acquired firm are typically sacked. And those who are retained lose the independence they had prior to the acquisition. The threat of a hostile takeover disciplines managerial behavior and induces managers to attempt to maximize shareholder value.

Strategies to Align the Interests of Principals and Agents

Finally, organizations should use strategies to align the interests of the principal and the agent. This can include measures such as incentive structures, bonus systems, and performance-based compensation. Additionally, organizations should ensure that the incentive structures and bonus systems are designed to ensure that the agent is motivated to act in the best interests of the principal.

Conclusion

In conclusion, agency problem is a conflict of interests between the principal and the agent, which can have serious repercussions for the organization if it is not addressed properly. The causes of agency problem can include lack of communication, lack of trust, lack of incentives, and lack of performance evaluation and performance measurement. There are several strategies that organizations can use to reduce agency problem, such as aligning the interests of the principal and the agent, ensuring effective performance evaluation and performance measurement, ensuring risk and reward sharing, ensuring effective corporate governance and internal control, and ensuring effective communication and conflict resolution.

It is important for organizations to address the agency problem in order to ensure effective management and decision-making. By following the strategies discussed in this article, organizations can reduce the agency problem and ensure that the interests of the principal and the agent are aligned.